The Federal High Court in Abuja struck out a suit filed by Sen. Ifeanyi Araraume challenging the recognition of Sen. Patrick Ndubueze as the All Progressives Congress (APC)’s candidate for 2027 Imo North Senatorial District election.
Justice Salim Ibrahim, in a judgment, held that the court lacked the jurisdiction to adjudicate on the case, a similar suit, having been determined by a court of coordinate jurisdiction.
Justice Ibrahim, who upheld the preliminary objection filed by Ndubueze, described the suit as “an abuse of court process.”
Although the judgment was delivered on Aug. 26, its certified true copy was sighted on Friday.
Ararume, in the suit marked FHC/ABJ/CS/1569/2026, sued APC, Ndubueze and INEC over a dispute on the valid candidate for the Imo North Senatorial District.
The former lawmaker sought an order directing INEC to recognise and publish his name as the APC’s candidate for the Imo North Senatorial District for the 2027 general elections.
He also sought an injunction, restraining Ndubueze from parading himself as the party’s candidate for the seat.
In addition, Araraume’s counsel, George Ibrahim, SAN, prayed the court to set aside the purported uploading of Ndubueze’s name by INEC on its portal on July 11 as the APC’s candidate for the district.
He equally sought an order directing INEC to instead upload his own name as the party’s candidate for the 2027 polls.
His originating summons was brought pursuant to Section 6(6)(a) and (b) of the 1999 Constitution, Sections 84(1) and 88(2) of the Electoral Act 2026, and Articles 20(ii)(a) and (iii) of the APC Constitution.
But APC and Ndubueze disagreed with Ararume’s arguments.
Ndubueze, in his preliminary objection filed by his counsel, Prof. Paul Ananaba, SAN, prayed the court to dismiss the suit for being grossly an abuse of the court process.
Alternatively, he sought an order striking out the suit for want of jurisdiction.
He argued that the dispute about the primary poll held on May 18 by the party had already been decided on June 25 by a Federal High Court in Owerri in another case.
INEC, in an affidavit of facts and written address filed by Johnson Usman, SAN, stated that it would abide by the determination of the court.
Usman further explained that under the prevailing nomination arrangement, political parties themselves uploaded candidates’ particulars through the access granted by the commission.
He stated that the name uploaded by the APC on July 11 was that of Ndubueze and that the said name remained on the portal as at the date of hearing.
Delivering the judgment, Justice Ibrahim held that before going into the substantive suit, the court would look at the preliminary objection filed by Ndubueze in line with the previous Supreme Court decision.
He agreed with Ndubueze’s submission that Owerri’s suit and the instant case bordered on the same subject matter.
“This court does not express any opinion upon whether the judgment of Owoibo, J., was right or wrongly decided.
“An allegedly erroneous judgment is not thereby rendered nonexistent.
“Until set aside by a court invested with appellate authority, it remains a subsisting judicial determination that a court of coordinate jurisdiction is bound to respect.
“It follows that having found that this court lacks jurisdiction to hear and determine the plaintiff/respondent’s substantive suit, the proper order to make in the circumstance is to strike out the instant suit.
“I therefore hold that, having regard to the subsisting judgment of the Federal High Court, Owerri Judicial Division, delivered by Hon. Justice I.N. Owoibo on 25th June, 2026, in Suit No. FHC/OW/CS/70/2026.
“The fact that the Federal High Court, by virtue of Section 19(1) of the FHC Act, makes the court one, but based on administrative convenience, the Chief Judge divided the court into different divisions pursuant to the powers of the Chief Judge.
“See Orji v Chima (Supra) per KEKERE-EKUN, JSC (as he then was now CJN), and also the fact that this is a gross abuse of court process, as this court is a court of coordinate jurisdiction with the Owerri division.
“I therefore find merit in the preliminary objection and hold that it ought to be sustained.
“Accordingly, I hereby sustain the preliminary objection and strike out Suit No. FHC/ABJ/CS/1569/2026… There shall be no order as to costs,” the judge ruled.
